Microsoft killing off Office Accounting product
Microsoft killing off Office Accounting product
The software maker said on Friday that it plans next month to stop distributing the accounting product line, ending the latest in a series of efforts to take on market leader Intuit.
The accounting product line was launched in 2005 amid some fanfare, but failed to grab much market share and was later pulled from retail shelves in favor of online-only sales.
“We continually evaluate our business strategies to make sure we’re working to meet the needs of customers, partners and shareholders,” Microsoft said on its Web site. “With that in mind, we have determined that existing free templates within Office used with Excel was a better option for small businesses, and the Microsoft Dynamics ERP products were appropriate for mid-range organizations.”
The software maker said it will stop distributing its free Office Accounting Express as well as all of the paid Office Accounting product in the United States and United Kingdom.
Microsoft has been paring back a number of the efforts at the periphery of its product line, including mainstays such as Microsoft Money, which had long been second fiddle to Intuit’s Quicken. The company has also discontinued its Windows Live OneCare security software.
Microsoft plans to continue supporting the Office Accounting product, although a number of related services are ending.
“Online sales from eBay and credit profile from Equifax will no longer be available after December 15, 2009,” Microsoft said. “However, your customers will still be able to pay e-mailed invoices directly through PayPal. In addition, credit card processing services and the ability to order compatible checks and forms will still be available.”
Those who have bought the product in the last 30 days can return it for a refund.
During her years at CNET News, Ina Fried has changed beats several times, changed genders once, and covered both of the Pirates of Silicon Valley. These days, most of her attention is focused on Microsoft. E-mail Ina.Intuit muscles into the Platform as a Service game
Intuit muscles into the Platform as a Service game |
||||
| By Carl Brooks, Technology Writer 28 Oct 2009 | SearchCloudComputing.com |
||||
|
||||
Intuit this week unveiled its own Platform as a Service (PaaS) model that parallels what Salesforce.com has done with Force.com — but with a twist.
|
||||
With the arrival of 2010 versions of Intuit’s popular desktop software, users will be able to purchase third-party custom applications from within the software itself — open Quickbooks, click a button and trade directly with a vendor.
The App Center comes at a important time for PaaS, with many seeing the model as a safer, easier way to use cloud computing than dealing directly with hosted infrastructure providers such as Amazon or Rackspace.
Intuit said it wants to solve common irritants like data security for users and open a new channel for revenue by giving developers an easy way to reach a tantalizing captive audience: Four million customers, most of them small and medium businesses (SMBs) that need to solve business problems on a budget.
“It’s the world of convenience, right?” said Alan Keller, VP of business development for VerticalResponse, which published an email marketing tool in the App Center. He thinks QuickBooks users are the perfect target for his company, and Intuit made it relatively easy to tie his application, which is not based on Intuit’s software or platform, into their database of user QuickBooks data.
Keller said that his firm has gleaned several hundred subscribers from the program so far, and hopes for more. VerticalResponse users really want to avoid entangling themselves in multiple software applications and tools — they want everything built-in as much as possible. VerticalResponse has also been a part of Salesforce.com’s AppExchange online market, and Keller said it was a great success for similar reasons.
|
|||||||||||||||||
Intuit may face some heavy competition quickly, since Salesforce.com is backing FinanancialForce.com, an online accounting service that its users can use with AppExchange.
“It’s definitely where we see our customers going,” said Alex Chriss, director of Intuit’s partner program. Chriss said that while Intuit was under the radar in cloud computing, the $3 billion software company had spent the last year and half building out a data center to house customers’ online data, making synchronization a feature in 2009 and opening the “federated Inuit platform” this summer.
Intuit promises interoperability with other platforms
Intuit released application programming interfaces (APIs) in June to allow developers with applications from any platform to interface with the Intuit platform, opening up the field.
That’s a significant difference from customer relationship management (CRM) leader and PaaS provider Salesforce.com, which restricts developers to its proprietary Apex coding language. Intuit’s platform is built on Quickbase and open source Adobe Flex. Intuit also encourages an open source community of developers to swap code and ideas, something Salesforce.com emphatically does not support. Both platforms run on Salesforce.com and Intuit’s respective data centers.
Intuit’s Workplace platform and App Center now present a potent avenue for developers to reach users who wouldn’t ever turn to advanced computing tools or build their own infrastructure in the cloud.
At least that’s the hope, according to Intuit. The vendor has a captive audience and a loyal one, if only because small businesses can’t afford anything better, so by pushing applications in their faces, they can pick up ready money as they move into services. But these applications have to be worthwhile — currently there are around 30. Applications will be sold on a subscription basis and Intuit will take 20% of the revenue at this point, said Chriss.
Carl Brooks is the Technology Writer for SearchCloudComputing.com. Contact him at cbrooks@techtarget.com.
From Spreadsheets to Situational Applications in the Cloud: The End of Spreadsheet Purgatory
From Spreadsheets to Situational Applications in the Cloud: The End of Spreadsheet Purgatory
1 Comment
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 at 3:05PM
Spreadsheets are often used to build a class of applications that are fundamentally ill-suited to the spreadsheet model. The reason for this is that there has been no other way to build these types of applications, since IT is not geared up to build small, quick, rapidly changing situational applications. Besides not having the resources available, the cost of having IT build (and deploy) them is likely to be prohibitive.
But with the advent of Cloud Computing platforms, there is an alternative. In the Cloud, IT is no longer the sole owner of production (development teams) and delivery (the data center). Custom applications can be built much faster using less skilled resources, and deployment concerns like servers and backup are virtually eliminated. In addition, these applications can leverage the kind of functionality and resource that is only available in the Cloud, like social networks and access to massive storage on demand. Lastly, using a database-driven platform can address the “single source of truth” question that plagues every organization using spreadsheets for operational applications, by providing a centralized repository of validated, consistent and high quality data.
While this gives business units the ability to build solutions on their own, IT departments can play a championing role, educating business users on how to take advantage of situational application capabilities in the Cloud, without getting bogged down in traditional application development and deployment. IT can also provide the guidance business people need so they won’t create havoc, and help them stay out of compliance ( e.g. Sarbox) hot waters.
For the full white paper, contact us.
SaaS – Summary and Conclusions – THNIKStrategies, Inc.
Summary and Conclusions
SaaS is gaining widespread corporate acceptance and adoption because it overcomes many of the inadequacies of traditional, legacy, on-premise software products and “hosted” or “managed” applications.
SaaS shifts the burden of successful deployment and management from the customer to the vendor. It eliminates the need for additional hardware and staff. It accelerates the time to value and increases user productivity by increasing application reliability and security.
Although adopting SaaS solutions may mean that some corporate users have to curtail the level of customization they can demand, THINKstrategies has found that the vast majority of companies have gained business benefits which far out-weigh this limitation. These benefits include:
Quicker time to value
Higher return on investment
Greater scalability and agility
In an era when competitive, customer and compliance pressures are escalating, a growing number of enterprises are recognizing that SaaS represents a more economical and effective approach to obtaining and leveraging state-of-the-industry business applications.
About THINKstrategies, Inc.THINKstrategies is a strategic consulting services company formed specifically to address the unprecedented business challenges facing IT managers, solutions providers, and investors today as the technology industry shifts toward a services orientation. The company’s mission is to help our clients re-THINK their corporate strategies, and refocus their limited resources to achieve their business objectives. THINKstrategies has also founded the Software-as-a-Service Showplace (www.saas-showplace.com), an easy-to-use, online directory and resource center of over 3000 SaaS solutions from over 700 companies worldwide, organized into over 80 Application. Industry and Enabling Technology categories. The Showplace also includes information and insights regarding industry best practices. For more information regarding our unique services, visit www.thinkstrategies.com info@thinkstrategies.com
SaaS Slidehsow Presentation
Check out Project alternatives: Basecamp and QuickBase
Check out Project alternatives: Basecamp and QuickBase
Wednesday, April 22, 2009 11:06 AM
Learn more about 37signals’ Basecamp and Intuit’s QuickBase, two highly-capable alternatives to Microsoft Project.
For many IT pros and consultants, Microsoft Project has been the de facto standard for organizing work schedules, timelines and budgets.
Microsoft Project is still an incredibly capable and complex application; the program ties in to back-end servers to power large-scale collaboration and possesses astonishing levels of customization.
But does your next IT project really demand that much firepower?
Overkill is expensive, especially when you have to purchase, maintain, and administer the requisite back-end servers running everything.
As technology professionals, in particular, have become more comfortable working with Web-based applications, it’s no surprise that viable new alternatives have arisen. Web 2.0′s benefits are clear to most everyone working in a technical capacity.
Microsoft even offers Project 2007 as a Microsoft Office Online component (and includes Web-based connectivity options within its Microsoft Office Project Server 2007 and Microsoft Office Project Portfolio Server products).
Two new options to check out are 37signals’ Basecamp and Intuit’s QuickBase. Both offer highly-capable Web-based solutions to common project management issues.
Basecamp
37signals first caught my attention a few years ago when I discovered the company’s Ta-da List application. I was impressed with the task management software’s simplicity, cross-platform compatibility, and approachability.
Many IT professionals will find all the project management, collaboration, and scheduling elements they need in Basecamp. Companies from Trek Bicycle to Continental Airlines and a host of others rely upon the online application to power their project management work.
Just how capable is Basecamp? 37signals advertises comments from Jim Dunnigan (former Product Manager for Microsoft Project) on its Web site in which he is quoted as saying, “Basecamp is the first product I have seen that is truly project management for everyone.”
For just US$49 a month, subscribers to the Plus plan receive 10GB of storage, unlimited user accounts, time tracking, and capacity of 35 separate projects. Three other premium plans are available: Basic, Premium, and Max, The Max account (which is US$149/month) provides unlimited projects and 50 GB of storage. A limited free plan is also available that enables the creation of a single project; file sharing features are not included with the free account.
Basecamp simplifies complex projects with the introduction of color-coded projects, easy-to-learn dashboards, integrated to-do lists, and milestone and time tracking. Users also receive file sharing features, reporting functionality, online collaboration tools, and message boards. Milestone information can be exported in iCalendar formats, and e-mail messages can be set for a variety of events.
While Basecamp offers many comprehensive features, its simplicity also makes it easy for less experienced software users to get up to speed quickly. And, the less time a team member spends learning the intricacies of the project management team’s software (and the easier the project management software is to use), the more time he or she has to perform core functions.
QuickBase
Intuit, long known for its Quicken and QuickBooks products, offers a project management application called QuickBase. The Web-based project management tool is designed to provide staff with a streamlined program for data collection, project tracking, communication, and reporting.
JetBlue Airways and Ventana Medical Systems are among the larger companies now relying upon QuickBase to empower its project teams. Indeed, Intuit touts the software as being used by almost half of Fortune 100 companies.
At US$249 a month, QuickBase includes 10 user accounts. As with Basecamp, there are no contracts, and subscribers can cancel at any time. Additional users can be added for three dollars per user per month. More pricing information is available on Intuit’s Web site.
QuickBase includes several templates to help teams get started managing projects in just a few hours. Since the application is Web-based, the software is also cross-platform compatible and requires only that users have stable Internet connections and a valid user account.
Staff can create their own applications and leverage predesigned templates for a variety of vertical markets (including generalized project management, professional services, sales and customer management, IT management, marketing, process excellence, legal, real estate, and human resources). Customizable reports make it easy to glean needed information quickly, while table views, graphic timelines, and charting features help communicate complicated information in an easily understood format. Reminders and e-mail notifications can be set within the software, and role-based permissions are easy to set up.
Microsoft Project: No longer the only game in town
For some organizations, Microsoft Project (and even back-end Project servers for empowering larger-scale collaboration) may be the most appropriate option. But many offices and small businesses will find all the project management features (minus the administrative headaches) they need in one of these two alternatives. Best of all, organizations can test drive both programs at no charge thanks to each vendor offering a free trial.
Erik Eckel earned a bachelor’s degree from the University of Louisville and completed Sullivan College’s Microsoft Engineer program. He holds Microsoft Certified Professional, Microsoft Certified Professional + Internet, Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer, and CompTIA Network+ certifications. He’s worked with computers and Internet technologies for 15 years and has written and edited best-selling computer books for such publishers as Coriolis, O’Reilly, and TechRepublic. In 2006 he opened Louisville’s first Computer Troubleshooters franchise.
Building Information Systems at the Edge of Chaos
Situational Applications in 60 Seconds
24 years of Windows package design
Operating systems News
24 years of Windows package design
A history of Microsoft’s OS in card and plastic
Saturday at 08:00 BST | Tell us what you think [ 2 comments ]
Software packaging isn’t exactly the epitome of great design. And, as the world’s most used operating system – and being from Microsoft – Windows has had some rather dull boxes designed for it to sit within.
But it’s also had some great packaging designed for it too, so we’ve gathered together images of the box art from each version of Windows, from 1985′s Windows 1.0 to next week’s Windows 7.
Windows 1.0 – blue is the colour
An “operating environment,” Windows 1.0 may have had an eye-catching ad featuring Steve Ballmer, but the design of the box was aimed squarely at business and featured the old Microsoft logo on a navy background.

Windows 2 (286 and 386 versions) – 80s stripes and snazzy desktops
Two versions for different PC variants, the Windows 2.0 boxes were also pretty dull but introduced typical 80s window blinds and images of the now-colourful Windows desktop.Note the new Microsoft logo, too.


Windows 3.0 – look at my clickety clack keyboard!
Still on 5.25-inch disks notice, Windows 3.0 is now called a “graphical environment” – still running atop MS DOS of course. But isn’t the imagery still really, really dark and dingy? “Windows 3.0: underworld edition?”

Windows 3.1 – 90s clean lines and the Windows flag
Ah that’s better. Scarily the best part of 20 years old, 3.1 made its debut in 1992 and together with Workgroups (see below) was a huge success. A cleaner box design resulted (albeit with that strange, spidery font), while it’s also the first time we see the Windows flag.

By contrast, the upgrade edition eschews the Windows flag completely.

Windows 3.1 for Workgroups – “yes! I have more than one PC!”
The Workgroups box suffered from a bit of font overload…

Windows 95 – more power AND fun
Wow! As well as upping the game in terms of the OS itself, Microsoft went all consumer on us for Windows 95′s packaging. Indeed, Microsoft’s subsequent reputation for putting too many messages on the box probably started here (see the “what if Microsoft packaged the iPod” video). Windows 95 still came on a floppy if you wanted it.

Windows NT – the night sky
The business-orientated NT version was the first fully 32-bit version of Windows and formed the basis for the Windows we still use today – all “home” versions after Windows Me (starting with Windows XP) were based on the more stable and secure NT codebase.

Windows 98 – works better, play better
A development on the Windows 95 box but easier on the eye, the Windows 98 packaging continued the “too much information” era. Shame the box was so similar to the Windows 95 one that Microsoft had to stick a NEW VERSION! flash on it.

Windows 2000 – the dullest Windows box yet
Apologies in advance, as you’ll now have to suffer two poor packaging efforts. Returning to white, Microsoft went back to basics. It’s a shame for Windows 2000, as it was a super OS.

Windows Me – bland box, rubbish OS
Windows Me was Windows 98 with a few new bits from Windows 2000 and a renewed focus on media content. However, it was as rubbish as the box was dull.

Windows XP – the green and the blue
The non-shoutiness of the Windows XP packaging was surprising given the quantum leap forward that Windows XP represented over Me. But it was clever design – the difference between the editions was clear and nowhere near as confusing as the myriad of Vista versions.


Windows Vista – plastic is, like, so green
Nick White on the Windows Blog, announced the new packaging for Vista and Office 2007. “The packaging has been completely revised and, we hope, foreshadows the great experience that awaits you once you open it.” Hmmm. In a disappointing move environmentally, Microsoft moved to a clear plastic design. Blogger Long Zheng was more positive, calling it “holy freaking super deliciously awesome.”

Windows 7 – selling itself
Microsoft has simplified the design for Windows 7, with a cardboard outer and plastic inner. “The plastic case protecting the Windows 7 disk is lighter and is recyclable,” explains Microsoft blogger Brandon LeBlanc writing on the Windows 7 blog. “The packaging itself has a 37 per cent weight reduction and the econometrics score has improved by 50 per cent over it’s predecessor.” Things would have been even better if there was no plastic though.

——————————————————————————————————-
Liked this? Then check out TechRadar’s bumper selection of Windows 7 tips, tricks and secrets






